Legal Opinion

MacKay v. Whitaker

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 30, 1952No. Civ. 15255PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

This is a motion to dismiss an appeal on the grounds that the judgment has been satisfied, and that the appellants have voluntarily accepted its benefits to the detriment of respondents.

The Maekays brought this action against the Whitakers, the Emslies, James C. Philips and the Philips corporation for declaratory relief and to quiet title to a parcel of property on which the Emslies had been conducting a kennel. The kennel property was subject to a first deed of trust given by the Emslies to a loan company to secure a $10,000 note. The claim of the Maekays to the property grows out of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Reitano v. YankwichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Schubert v. ReichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Stein v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Preluzsky v. Pacific Co-Operative Cafeteria Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Guho v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lee v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. MacKay v. WhitakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Hummel v. RobertsNevada Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Lee v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API