Legal Opinion

Hummel v. Roberts

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1954No. 3756PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Eather, C. J.:

Plaintiff in the court below obtained on February 9, 1953, a judgment reforming and requiring specific performance of an option and contract for the purchase of *227land and cattle by him from defendants upon payment of part of the purchase price in cash and the execution of a first mortgage for the remainder, which judgment directed defendants to execute and deliver the necessary title documents, all in accordance with the option.

The contract was made September 26, 1949, and called for completion on November 1, 1949. However, defendants declined to perform and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Reitano v. YankwichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Preluzsky v. Pacific Co-Operative Cafeteria Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Murphy v. . SpauldingNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  4. Cunningham v. CunninghamNevada Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Gerbig v. GerbigNevada Supreme Court · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Culbertson v. CulbertsonNevada Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Basic Refractories, Inc. v. BrightNevada Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API