Murray v. Mossman
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.
This is an action for damages arising from an automobile collision. At the commencement of trial, defendant amended his answer, admitted liability, and lim ited the issue to the amount of damages to which plaintiff might be entitled. Defendant appeals from the judgment entered after the jury verdict.
We-consider appellant’s (defendant’s) eight assignments of error in order, stating only those facts necessary to the discussion of each assignment.
On voir dire examination of prospective juror number one, appellant’s counsel inqhired if she were a member of a' certain fraternal organization. She…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Johnson v. HowardWashington Supreme Court · 1954
- State v. TharpWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Connolly v. Pre-Mixed Concrete Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
- Ulve v. City of RaymondWashington Supreme Court · 1957
- Hart v. Niagara Fire InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1894
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- City of Fairbanks v. NesbettAlaska Supreme Court · 1967
- Murray v. MossmanWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- In RE ESTES v. HoppWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- Levea v. G. A. Gray Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1977
- Christ v. SchwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.