Legal Opinion

Goddard v. East Texas Fire Insurance

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1886No. 2091PublishedCited by 77 opinions

Appeal from Kaufman. Tried below before the Hon. Anson Rainey.

1Opinion of the Court

Willie, Chief Justice.

It is apparent from the case made by the evidence that the failure of Goddard to keep his books and inventory in an iron safe at night, did not arise from any intention on his part to deprive the insurance company of evidence as to the amount of the stock, tools and machinery he had on hand at the time of the fire. He was wholly ignorant of the existence of any clause in the policy imposing this duty upon . him.

It is not made to appear that the company has been damaged in the least by reason of Goddard’s default in this respect; for the value of the stock at the time the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. Ætna Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  2. Farmers' Insurance & Loan Co. v. SnyderCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1836
  3. Ætna Insurance v. Jackson, Owsley & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1855
  4. Kentucky & Louisville Mutual Insurance v. SouthardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1848

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Fredonia State Bank v. General American Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Brown v. Palatine Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Aetna Insurance v. HolcombTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Bills v. Hibernia Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Cohen v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API