Legal Opinion

Dandini v. Dandini

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 14, 1953No. Civ. 15211PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.

The defendants appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff. Plaintiff is the wife of defendant A. 0. Dandini and secured a decree for separate maintenance against him in 1946. By the terms of that decree plaintiff herein was awarded all of the community property then disclosed to the court and A. 0. Dandini was ordered to pay her $150 per month.

The basis of this action, count two thereof, on which the judgment is rendered is that A. 0. Dandini and the defendants Sesenna conspired to defraud plaintiff of her interest in certain community property and to conceal from plaintiff and the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jorgensen v. JorgensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Revert v. HesseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Green v. DuvergeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Johnstone v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Milekovich v. QuinnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Flores v. ArroyoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Agnew v. ParksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Merco Construction Engineers, Inc. v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Ramey v. General Petroleum Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. In Re Marriage of ModnickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API