Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Modnick

California Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1983No. L.A. 31649PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BIRD C. J.

In a marital dissolution proceeding, does the failure of one spouse to disclose the existence of a community property asset constitute extrinsic fraud?

I

After 22 years of marriage, Marilyn and Zelig Modnick separated in September of 1974. The next month, Marilyn petitioned the superior court for a dissolution of the marriage, alleging irreconcilable differences between the parties.

A trial began on September 18, 1975, and, after several continuances, concluded on April 26, 1976. Zelig testified that he had no bank accounts other than one checking account with a $7 balance. His…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
  3. Vai v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Jorgensen v. JorgensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Flores v. ArroyoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Ochoa v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Wilkinson v. Times Mirror Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. In Re Marriage of StevenotCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. David Welch Co. v. Erskine & TulleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. In Re Estate of BreardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API