Legal Opinion

AKG REAL ESTATE, LLC v. Kosterman

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 2006No. 2004AP188PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavid T. Prosser, J.

¶ 1. This case presents the question whether an express easement may be relocated or terminated without the consent of the dominant estate. In a published decision,1 the court of appeals held that a servient estate could unilaterally terminate an express right-of-way easement once the servient estate provided an alternate route of ingress and egress to the dominant estate. We reverse the court of appeals because we conclude that the owner of a servient estate cannot unilaterally relocate or terminate an express easement.

HH

¶ 2. We begin this case about easements by reviewing several key terms.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Lewis v. YoungNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Jacque v. Steenberg Homes, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  3. M.P.M. Builders, LLC v. DwyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  4. Roaring Fork Club, L.P. v. St. Jude's Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  5. Davis v. BrukSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Wickenhauser v. LehtinenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  2. City of Janesville v. CC Midwest, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  3. McNeil v. HansenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Rio Grande Silvery Minnow v. Bureau of ReclamationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  5. McNAUGHTON PROPERTIES, LP v. BarrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API