Legal Opinion

MD Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. Abrams

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 27, 2006No. 2-06-0135PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hutchinson

Plaintiff, MD Electrical Contractors, Inc., sued defendants, Fred and Carol Abrams, in quantum meruit to recover for improvements that it made as a subcontractor on a home improvement project. Defendants moved to dismiss the complaint (see 735 ILCS 5/2— 619(a)(9) (West 2004)), contending that, because plaintiff had violated the Home Repair and Remodeling Act (Act) (815 ILCS 513/1 et seq. (West 2004)), it could not recover. The trial court granted the motion. On appeal, plaintiff contends that (1) the Act does not apply to plaintiff as a subcontractor, and (2) even if the Act does apply, it…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. MaggetteIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  2. In Re Estate of DierkesIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Reda v. Advocate Health CareIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  4. People v. WooddellIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Meadows v. HigginsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. MD Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. AbramsIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Smith v. BogardAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  3. Artisan Design Build, Inc. v. BilstromAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  4. NDC LLC v. TopinkaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  5. Senno v. The Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family ServicesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API