Legal Opinion
Sanders v. City of New York
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 17, 1988No. 86 CIV. 8876 (PKL)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
LEISURE, District Judge:
This action, brought pursuant to section 1983 of Title 42 of the United States Code, alleges a violation of plaintiffs civil rights. Plaintiff, Richard Sanders (“Sanders”) seeks damages from the City of New York (“City”) and two individual police officers, Ivan Montero (“Montero”) and Martin Romanchick (“Romanchick”). Now before the Court is plaintiffs motion for leave to file an amended complaint and the City’s motion for dismissal of the complaint and amended complaint. For the reasons stated below, the motion to amend the complaint is granted in part…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Davidson v. CannonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Goldman v. BeldenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Robert J. Fine v. The City of New York, Anthony SaladinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Chayo v. KaladjianDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Marcus v. CarrasquilloDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1992
- Ruderman v. Police Dept. of City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Rigby v. CoughlinDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1990
- Wyatt, as Administratrix of the Estate of India T. Cummings v. County of ErieDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2021