Legal Opinion

State v. Hammonds

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 14, 1976No. 40PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice.

Defendant first assigns as error the failure of the trial court to direct a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity. Dr. Hinson, a private psychiatrist who examined defendant prior to trial, and Dr. Rollins, Director of Forensic Services at Dorothea Dix Hospital, where defendant was sent for pretrial examination, testified that in their opinions defendant, as a result of mental illness and defect in reason, was not able to distinguish right from wrong at the time of the alleged crime. Each further testified that this inability to distinguish right from wrong resulted from…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Leland v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Archibald Lyles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. State v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. ZunigaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  3. Robison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  4. State v. ShicklesUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. LocklearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2009

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API