Legal Opinion

State v. Cruz

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 29, 1994No. 12261PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpear, J.

The defendant, Justo Cruz, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree in violation of General *850Statutes § 53a-134 (a) (3).1 The defendant claims that the trial court (1) improperly instructed the jury that a reasonable doubt is not “a slight doubt,” (2) unfairly marshaled the evidence during its charge to the jury, thereby depriving the defendant of a fair trial, and (3) gave an unbalanced and coercive charge after the jury reported that it was deadlocked five to one. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The jury reasonably could…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Cupp v. NaughtenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. Francis v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Cage v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1881

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FisherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Commonwealth v. FisherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Cruz v. Warden, No. Cv 93 1672 (Mxt) (Mar. 10, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995
  4. State v. CruzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API