Legal Opinion

State v. Novoa

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 29, 1992No. 14564PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The only issue in this certified criminal appeal is whether the Appellate Court correctly determined that information obtained as the result of a properly authorized wiretap may be admitted into evidence in a criminal prosecution under General Statutes § 21a-278.1 In the trial court, the defendant, Rosalbina Novoa, was charged with conspiracy to possess cocaine with the intent to sell, in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-48 and 21a-278 (b). After the denial of her pre*324trial motion to suppress wiretap evidence, a jury convicted her of the crime charged and the trial court sentenced her to a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. SantiagoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. State v. SoltesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  3. State v. NovoaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  4. State v. NovoaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. PriceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  2. Strong v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API