Legal Opinion
Ridley Township v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 20, 1953No. Appeal, No. 211PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Reno, J.,
This is the appeal of the Township of Ridley and 12 property owners from an order of the Pennsylvania *475Public Utility Commission dismissing their complaint against the Philadelphia Suburban Water Company, intervening appellee, for refusing their request for an extension of its facilities.
Ridley is a township of the first class, located in Delaware County, within the Company’s chartered territory. Its population of 8641 in 1940 was increased to 17,212 in 1950, an increase of 8571 or 99%, which is comparable with the increase in Delaware County of 33% and in Pennsylvania of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Hoffman v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Altoona v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Philadelphia Rural T. Co. v. P.S.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Riverton Consolidated Water Co. v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Yezioro v. North Fayette County Municipal AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Colonial Products Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- McCormick v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.