Philadelphia Rural T. Co. v. P.S.C.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Gawthrop, J.,
This is an appeal from an order of the Public Service Commission sustaining a complaint filed by the Borough of Bockledge, the commissioners of Abington Township, Montgomery County, several individuals, and the local improvement associations of Bockledge Borough, and the section of Abington Township known as Hollywood, because of the refusal of the Philadelphia Rural Transit Company, hereinafter called appellant, to extend into Hollywood its bus routes “N” and “O” which, as now operated on Huntingdon Turnpike, stop at the line which divides Montgomery County and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- New York Ex Rel. New York & Queens Gas Co. v. McCallSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. v. R.R. Comm'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Sherman v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Lycoming Edison Co. v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
3Cited by13 opinions
- Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Elk Run Telephone Co. v. General Telephone Co. of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
- Georgia Public-Service Commission v. Georgia Power Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- Ridley Township v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Riverton Consolidated Water Co. v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.