Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Jager v. County of Alameda

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 29, 1992No. A053543PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MERRILL, J.

Procedural and Factual Background

The trial court sustained a demurrer without leave to amend to the complaint of appellant Christine Ann Jager which alleged professional negligence on the part of respondents County of Alameda, John J. Meehan, District Attorney of Alameda County, and Board of Supervisors of Alameda County. Thereafter, the trial court entered judgment against Jager and in favor of respondents. Jager appeals.

By her complaint Jager alleged that on April 27, 1988, the family support division of the Alameda County District Attorney’s office obtained an order…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Heckendorn v. City of San MarinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Davis v. DamrellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  3. Monterey County v. CornejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. McKell v. Washington Mutual, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. Haney v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  3. McKell v. Washington Mut., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. Kong v. CITY OF HAWAIIAN GARDENS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCYCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  5. Young v. GannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API