Legal Opinion

Dowdall v. Gilmore Oil Co., Ltd.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 2, 1936No. Civ. 5608PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.

The question here involved is as to the propriety of refusing to give an instruction offered by defendant and the giving of an instruction submitted by plaintiff. For a proper understanding of the controversy it is necessary to briefly set forth the facts.

John F. Griffin was the branch manager of the Gilmore Oil Company with headquarters in Chico. For about ten days prior to July 23, 1934, Griffin had been discussing with plaintiff the feasibility of plaintiff leasing and operating an oil station in Oroville, known as Henderson service station. By prearrangement Griffin went to Paradise on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Haney v. TakakuraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. Bickford v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Libby v. DunstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hyatt v. Sierra Boat Co.California Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. Griffin v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. Novak v. PeiraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Moore v. BeltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Moore v. BeltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API