Legal Opinion

Moore v. Belt

California Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1949No. L. A. 20994Published

1Opinion of the Court

34 Cal.2d 525 (1949)

H. T. MOORE, Appellant,

v.

ELMER BELT, Respondent.

L. A. No. 20994.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

Dec. 16, 1949.

E. Briggs Howarth and Walter R. Trinkaus for Appellant.

Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Balthis as Amici Curiae on behalf of Appellant.

Fulcher & Wynn, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher and Phillip C. Sterry for Respondent.

Hartley F. Peart, Gus L. Baraty, Howard Hassard, George A. Smith, Alan L. Bonnington, Reed & Kirtland and Louis J. Regan as Amici Curiae on behalf of Respondent.

SHENK, J.

Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment on a verdict for the defendant in an action to…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Ybarra v. SpangardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Meiselman v. Crown Heights Hospital, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1941
  3. Lawless v. CalawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Sinz v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Barham v. WidingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API