Legal Opinion

Libby v. Dunston

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 30, 1925No. Docket No. 4373PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

This action was brought to recover damages alleged to have been sustained in an automobile collision, and resulted in a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in said action. The appellant requested the trial court to instruct the jury as follows: “You are instructed that if you shall find from the testimony that prior to the time of the collision, the defendant had been driving and operating his automobile in an ordinarily careful and prudent manner and with due regard to the regulations governing speed and care in the operation of an automobile, and that prior to the collision and without fault…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Goodwin v. McCabeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Swensen v. BenderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1902
  3. Buckley v. SilverbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Carpenter v. EwingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Hunt v. ElliottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Levy-Zentner Co. v. SOUTHERN PAC. TRANSPORTATIONCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. WassermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. Moreno v. Fey Manufacturing Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Novak v. PeiraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Dowdall v. Gilmore Oil Co., Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API