Legal Opinion

People v. Daggs

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 12, 2005No. A107792PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STEIN, J.

James Daggs entered a plea of no contest to one count of robbery after the court denied his motion to suppress evidence. The court suspended imposition of sentence and placed defendant on supervised probation for three years on condition that he serve eight months in county jail, and required him to pay restitution and fines. He filed a timely notice of appeal.

We shall find no error with respect to the court’s determination that defendant abandoned his cell phone at the scene of the robbery, and therefore no unlawful search occurred when the police removed the battery to view…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. People v. AyalaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  4. United States v. Carless Jones and Eugene HarveyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  5. United States v. Daniel ThomasCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. ParsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Brian L. Harrison v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. People v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. State v. HuertaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  5. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API