Legal Opinion
State v. Huerta
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided February 10, 2010No. 2 CA-CR 2009-0078PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ESPINOSA, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 After the trial court granted Alexander Huerta’s motion to suppress all evidence related to a shei'iffs deputy’s discovery of cocaine in an unclaimed duffle bag, the state dismissed all pending charges against Huerta and now appeals the trial court’s suppression ruling. Finding no illegal search occurred, we reverse.
Factual and Procedural History
¶ 2 We review the facts in the light most favorable to upholding a trial court’s ruling on a motion to suppress. State v. Teagle, 217 Ariz. 17, ¶ 2, 170 P.3d 266, 269 (App.2007). The following facts are undisputed.…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. James Andrew Colbert and Michael Beryl ReeseCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- State v. AultArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- United States v. Roger NordlingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- State v. BoltArizona Supreme Court · 1984
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. PeltzCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
- State v. AhumadaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- State v. AguilarCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- State v. MixtonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- Huerta v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.