Legal Opinion
People v. Baker
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 15, 2008No. F052913PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WISEMAN, J.
PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL SUMMARIES
On February 6, 2007, appellant Wendy Nichole Baker was charged by information filed in Kern County Superior Court with possession of methamphetamine, a violation of Health and Safety Code section 11377, subdivision (a). The information further alleged that Baker had served a prior prison term within the meaning of Penal Code 1 section 667.5, subdivision (b). After her motion to suppress evidence was denied, Baker entered a plea of no contest to misdemeanor possession of methamphetamine. At sentencing, the court suspended imposition of sentence…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- People v. SchmitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- People v. MasonAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2016
- People v. Arredondo, California Court of Appeal, 6th District2016
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Uspenskaya v. MelineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.