Legal Opinion
Barnes v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided November 24, 2009No. 04-1335CPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ALLEGRA, Judge.
Pending before the court, in this class action, is the parties’ Joint Motion To Approve Settlement Agreement. The parties assert that, under RCFC 23(e), the court should preliminarily approve the parties’ proposed settlement agreement. For the reasons that follow, the court GRANTS this motion.
The plaintiffs named above filed their initial complaint on August 18, 2004, and filed an amended class action complaint on November 16, 2004. The proposed class consisted of civilian employees of the Department of Navy who worked at healthcare facilities after August 18, 1998, and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- 29 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1473, 30 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,064 the Officers for Justice, and Jesse J. Byrd v. The Civil Service Commission of the City and County of San Francisco, United States of America v. The City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- National Rural Telecommunications Cooperative v. Directv, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2004
- Kevin Armstrong v. Board Of School Directors Of The City Of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Barnes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lambert v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Thomas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Furlong v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Furlong v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Greenwood v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.