Furlong v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Rails-to-Trails; Class Action; RCFC .23(e); Final Approval of Settlement Agreement
OPINION AND ORDER
SWEENEY, Judge
Before the court is the parties’ request, pursuant to Rule 23(e) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”), for final approval of the proposed settlement agreement in this Rails-to-Trails class action. Upon review of the proposed settlement agreement, and for the reasons stated below, the court grants the parties’ request.
I. BACKGROUND
In this case, plaintiffs contend that they own real property adjacent to a 9.14-mile rail corridor in Albany County, New…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Haggart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Sabo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Sharon Raulerson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Dauphin Island Property Owners Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Hufford v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hardy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
- Technical College of the Low Country v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020