Legal Opinion

Furlong v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 16, 2017No. 09-367LPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rails-to-Trails; Class Action; RCFC .23(e); Final Approval of Settlement Agreement

OPINION AND ORDER

SWEENEY, Judge

Before the court is the parties’ request, pursuant to Rule 23(e) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”), for final approval of the proposed settlement agreement in this Rails-to-Trails class action. Upon review of the proposed settlement agreement, and for the reasons stated below, the court grants the parties’ request.

I. BACKGROUND

In this case, plaintiffs contend that they own real property adjacent to a 9.14-mile rail corridor in Albany County, New…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Haggart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  2. Sabo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  3. Sharon Raulerson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  4. Dauphin Island Property Owners Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  5. Hufford v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hardy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
  2. Technical College of the Low Country v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API