Legal Opinion

Furlong v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 18, 2017No. 09-367LPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Rails-to-Trails; Class Action; RCFC 23(e); Preliminary Approval of Settlement; Notice Plan; Fairness Hearing

OPINION AND ORDER

MARGARET M. SWEENEY, Judge

In this Rails-to-Trails action, 271 plaintiffs contend that they own real property adjacent to a 9.14-mile rail corridor in Albany County, New York. They assert that until July 8, 2003, the Delaware and Hudson Railway Company, Inc., d/b/a Canadian Pacific Railway Company, and its predecessors held easements for railroad purposes that crossed their land. According to plaintiffs, defendant United States authorized the conversion of the railroad…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Haggart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  2. Lambert v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  3. Barnes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  4. Thomas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Furlong v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API