Pacific States Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Coachella
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TIMLIN J.
The plaintiff in this matter, Pacific States Enterprises, Inc. (Pacific), appeals from the dismissal of its first amended complaint as against two defendants pursuant to section 581, subdivision (f)(1) and (2) of the Code of Civil Procedure after their demurrers to the first amended complaint were sustained. 1 On appeal, Pacific contends that: (1) With regard to the defendant City of Coachella (City)—(a) the trial court erred in sustaining the City’s demurrer to the first amended complaint and (b) even if the trial court was correct in sustaining the City’s demurrer to the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ion Equipment Corp. v. NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Nichols v. Canoga IndustriesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- County of Los Angeles v. Continental Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1952
- Oceanside Marina Towers Ass'n v. Oceanside Community Development CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Chitwood v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Berg & Berg Enterprises, LLC v. BoyleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- County of Solano v. Vallejo Redevelopment AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Pavicich v. SantucciCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- City of Scotts Valley v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- San Diegans for Open Government v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.