Legal Opinion

Chitwood v. County of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 20, 1971No. Civ. 36953PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROTH, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered against plaintiff (appellant) and an order denying appellant’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint.

On May 4, 1967, plaintiff filed a complaint against County of Los Angeles, defendant (respondent) and Does I-X inclusive, alleging substantial-damage wrongfully caused by defendants to her property in December 1966 as the result of the construction of a huge pipe on property for the maintenance of which defendants were responsible, which pipe changed the “natural flow of rainfall.” Respondent filed its answer on May 12, 1967.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Judson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Goodwine v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Davenport v. Superior Court of Imperial CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Price v. McComishCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Stephens v. BerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. DIAL 800 v. FesbinderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  2. Dieckmann v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. Davis v. Eighth Judicial Dist. of State of Nev.Nevada Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Semole v. SansoucieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Kleinecke v. Montecito Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API