Legal Opinion
Pavicich v. Santucci
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 8, 2000No. H019844, H020472PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ELIA, J.
Appellant Anthony H. Santucci, an attorney, demurred to the complaints and cross-complaints of respondents Los Gatos Brewery Limited Partners, Andrew P. Pavicich, Jr., and Los Gatos Brewing Company, Inc. Among other things, Santucci alleged that respondents did not comply with Civil Code section 1714.10, concerning actions against an attorney for civil conspiracy. The trial court twice overruled Santucci’s demurrers as to the conspiracy causes of action. It found that section 1714.10 did not apply. We affirm.
Facts and Procedural Background
We treat as true the material…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Goodman v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- College Hospital, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Bigler-Engler v. Breg, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2017
- Berg & Berg Enterprises, LLC v. BoyleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Shafer v. Berger, Kahn, Shafton, Moss, Figler, Simon & GladstoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Vega v. Jones, Day, Reavis & PogueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Hoffman v. 162 North Wolfe CA6California Court of Appeal · 2014
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.