Legal Opinion
Johnson v. BP Chemicals, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided April 14, 1999No. 97-2723PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
The central question for our consideration is whether the court of appeals erred in concluding that R.C. 2745.01 is unconstitutional. Johnson has also filed a cross-appeal, contending that the trial court and court of appeals erred in dismissing his products liability claims.
I
R.C. 2745.01
R.C. 2745.01 became effective November 1, 1995. See Am.H.B. No. 103, 146 Ohio Laws, Part I, 756, 760.2 This legislation represents yet another attempt by *302the General Assembly to govern when and under what circumstances an intentional tort claim may be commenced and maintained by an employee against his or her…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mitchell v. Lawson Milk Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- Blankenship v. Cincinnati Milacron Chemicals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
- Fyffe v. Jeno's, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- Arnold v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Kaminski v. Metal & Wire Products Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2010
- Stetter v. R.J. Corman Derailment Services, L.L.C.Ohio Supreme Court · 2010
- Houdek v. ThyssenKrupp Materials N.A., Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2012
- Sierra v. Associated Marine Institutes, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Hoyle v. DTJ Enterprises, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.