Legal Opinion

Houdek v. ThyssenKrupp Materials N.A., Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 2012No. 2011-1076PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Donnell, J.

{¶ 1} ThyssenKrupp Materials N.A., Inc., appeals from a judgment of the Eighth District Court of Appeals that reversed a grant of summary judgment in its favor on claims that one of its supervisors had directed Bruce R. Houdek to work in an aisle of a warehouse where he sustained injuries when a co-worker operating a sideloader struck him. We are asked to consider the impact of a recently enacted statute on our prior case decisions which held employers liable for intentional torts occurring in the workplace when injuries were substantially certain to occur.

{¶ 2} R.C. 2745.01(A), effective…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Blankenship v. Cincinnati Milacron Chemicals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Fyffe v. Jeno's, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Jones v. VIP Development Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Brady v. Safety-Kleen Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Kaminski v. Metal & Wire Products Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Pelletier v. Campbell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  2. McConnell v. Dudley (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Hoyle v. DTJ Enterprises, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Doe v. Greenville City SchoolsOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Bliss v. Johns ManvilleOhio Supreme Court · 2022

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API