Romona Oolitic Stone Co. v. Tate
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Owen Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Ross, J. —
The appellee brought this action to recover damages for injuries received while in appellant’s service. On this appeal the appellant assigns three errors for the reversal of the judgment of the court below, namely:
“1st. The court erred in overruling appellant’s motion to require appellee to make his complaint more specific.”
“2d. The court erred in overruling the demurrer to the complaint.”
“3d. The court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.”
The material facts alleged in the complaint are admitted to be substantially as follows: The appellant is a corporation and engaged in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. CristIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis Consolidated Railway Co. v. HanningIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Stewart v. Pennsylvania Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Ivens v. Cincinnati, Wabash & Michigan Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. SchmidtIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Guedelhofer v. ErnstingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
- Merica v. Fort Wayne & Wabash Valley Traction Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1912
- Bennett v. Evansville & Terre Haute RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
- Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. TackettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
- Mayer v. LaneNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.