Legal Opinion

Ivens v. Cincinnati, Wabash & Michigan Railway Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1885No. 11,061PublishedCited by 26 opinions

From the Huntington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtZollars, J.

Appellant was injured in a collision with one of appellee’s trains, and brought this action to recover damages. A demurrer was sustained to the second paragraph of his complaint. That ruling presents the only question for decision here. In the formal part of the paragraph, it is charged that appellee, by its agents and servants, wrongfully, negligently, carelessly, wilfully and purposely, ran one of its trains upon appellant, and wounded and crippled him, without any negligence on his part. Immediately following this is the averment, “which injury was done and caused as follows : ” (Here…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Illinois Central Railroad v. HetheringtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. GrahamIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. City of Evansville v. WorthingtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MeansIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co v. CrolyIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. BryanIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1898

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API