Ivens v. Cincinnati, Wabash & Michigan Railway Co.
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Huntington Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtZollars, J.
Appellant was injured in a collision with one of appellee’s trains, and brought this action to recover damages. A demurrer was sustained to the second paragraph of his complaint. That ruling presents the only question for decision here. In the formal part of the paragraph, it is charged that appellee, by its agents and servants, wrongfully, negligently, carelessly, wilfully and purposely, ran one of its trains upon appellant, and wounded and crippled him, without any negligence on his part. Immediately following this is the averment, “which injury was done and caused as follows : ” (Here…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Illinois Central Railroad v. HetheringtonIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
- Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. GrahamIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- City of Evansville v. WorthingtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by26 opinions
- Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MeansIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
- Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co v. CrolyIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. BryanIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.