Neal v. Leslie Fay, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Judge.
Since, as the trier of fact, the Industrial Commission has the same prerogatives as a jury in weighing evidence, appeals from the Commission often raise but two legal questions: Are the Commission’s findings of fact supported by competent evidence? And do the findings support the Commission’s conclusions of law and decision? 8 Strong’s N.C. Index 3d, Master and Servant Sec. 96 (1977); Hansel v. Sherman Textiles, 304 N.C. 44, 283 S.E. 2d 101 (1981). Though this appeal raises these questions they cannot be determined because the Commission’s findings of fact and conclusions of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rutledge v. Tultex Corp./Kings YarnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Hansel v. Sherman TextilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Haynes v. . Feldspar Producing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Caulder v. Waverly MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Caulder v. Waverly MillsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
3Cited by5 opinions
- Harris v. North American ProductsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
- Beaver v. City of SalisburyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- Hughes v. Frito Lay, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- Morris v. Kelly Springfield Tire Co.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2008
- Morrissey v. Chesebrough-PondsNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 1999