Legal Opinion

Morrissey v. Chesebrough-Ponds

North Carolina Industrial Commission

Decided March 16, 1999No. I.C. No. 464415Published

1Opinion of the Court

The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered into by the parties at the hearing, and following, and in a Pre-Trial Agreement admitted into evidence as Stipulated Exhibit #1, as:

STIPULATIONS

1. All parties are properly before the North Carolina Industrial Commission and are subject to and bound by the provisions of the North Carolina Workers' Compensation Act.

2. An employment relationship existed between plaintiff-employee and defendant-employer. Plaintiff was employed by defendant Chesebrough Ponds (hereinafter referred to as Chesebrough)…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hilliard v. Apex Cabinet Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Caulder v. Waverly MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Neal v. Leslie Fay, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API