Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Frito-Lay North America, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 26, 2017No. Case No.12-cv-01586-JSTPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
FILED UNDER SEAL1
Re: ECF No. 163
JON S, TIGAR, United States District Judge
In this putative class action about potato chips,2 named plaintiffs Markus Wilson and Doug Campen allége that Defendant Frito-Lay placed misleading labels on its potato chip products in violation of California consumer protection statutes. Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”), ECF No. 47.
Defendant Frito-Lay, North America, Inc. (“Frito-Lay”) has filed a motion for summary judgment. Because the evidence demonstrates that -neither Wilson, nor Campen relied on Frito-Lay’s…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Von Saher v. Norton Simon Museum of Art at PasadenaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Casey v. Odwalla, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Hughes v. Ester C Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2018
- In re Ariz. Theranos, Inc., Litig.District Court, D. Arizona · 2018
- Albrigo v. Chobani, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2025
- Alfredia Edwards as Independent Administrator of the Estate of Nathaniel Edwards v. Officer John DoeDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.