Legal Opinion

Whitfield v. Board of Supervisors

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 31, 1991No. A048613PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BENSON, J.

Ten homeless general assistance recipients appeal from the trial court’s denial of their petition for writ of mandate. Appellants challenge the adequacy of Alameda County’s general assistance grant level. Specifically, they ask that the county be ordered to conduct a factual study of the cost of subsistence for Alameda County indigents and to enact a new general assistance ordinance based on that study. The issue on appeal is whether the county satisfied its mandatory duty under the Welfare and Institutions Code to determine and adopt an appropriate standard of aid and care…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mooney v. PickettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Robbins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. County of Los Angeles v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. City and County of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Boehm v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Mendly v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. Independent Roofing Contractors of California, Inc. v. Department of Industrial RelationsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. Oberlander v. County of Contra CostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. Bell v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ALAMEDA CTY.California Court of Appeal · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API