Legal Opinion
Bell v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ALAMEDA CTY.
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 6, 1994No. A056574PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLINE, P. J.
Introduction
The Alameda County Board of Supervisors (County) appeals a judgment of the superior court granting a peremptory writ of mandate in favor of respondents general assistance recipients 1 directing County to refrain from implementing any grant reductions for homeless general assistance recipients or those with shelter and utility costs less than $194 per month and to refrain from implementing County’s proposed and existing vendor pay plan.
County contends that the enactment of Welfare and Institutions Code section 17000.5 allows the challenged policies and practices…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mooney v. PickettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Robbins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Cooper v. SwoapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Boehm v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hunt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- County of San Diego v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Western States Petroleum Ass'n v. State Department of Health ServercesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Watkins v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Gardner v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.