Legal Opinion

Territory of Hawaii v. Meyer

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1945No. Nos. 2551, 2555PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

LE BARON, J.

Tlie appellant by writs of error seeks review of two extensive trials at each of which the jury returned a verdict finding him guilty of larceny in the first degree and different presiding trial judges sentenced him to the penitentiary. Under the first writ there are nineteen assignments of error and under the second there are twenty-eight, two of the second being expressly abandoned in the briefs. There are thus a total of forty-five assignments submitted for consideration. Nevertheless appellant’s briefs, purportedly a presentation for review, contain no…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Lincoln v. Sun Vapor Street-Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
  2. Watumull v. Tax CommissionerHawaii Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Furtado v. RezentsHawaii Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Territory v. TaokHawaii Supreme Court · 1935
  5. First Trust Co. v. CabrinhaHawaii Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. PokiniHawaii Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Alamida v. WilsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Ala Moana Boat Owners' Ass'n v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Territory v. MartinHawaii Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Meyer v. Territory of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API