Legal Opinion

Watumull v. Tax Commissioner

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1937No. 2276PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

COKE, C. J.

The plaintiffs, plaintiffs in error, Jhamandas Watumull and D. J. Watumull, copartners doing business as the East India Store, come to this court by writ of error from an adverse judgment in the circuit court in an action instituted by them to recover from William Borthwick, tax commissioner of the Territory, the sum of $3.27 alleged to have been illegally collected by the latter.

At the outset counsel for the defendant in error questions the sufficiency of the assignments of error and he further complains that plaintiffs in error have wholly failed to embody…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mid-Pacific Dress Manufacturing Co. v. CadinhaHawaii Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Smith v. LaameaHawaii Supreme Court · 1927
  3. De Fraga v. Portuguese Mutual Benefit SocietyHawaii Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Zen v. Koon ChanHawaii Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Sovereign Camp of the Woodmen of the World v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lyon v. BushHawaii Supreme Court · 1966
  2. State v. Kahua Ranch, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1964
  3. In re State to Register Title to Real Property Situate at MoililiHawaii Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Territory of Hawaii v. MeyerHawaii Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Territory of Hawaii v. SantanaHawaii Supreme Court · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API