Legal Opinion

Territory v. Taok

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 1935No. 2168PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

PETERS, J.

The defendant was complained against upon the information of the public prosecutor of the City and County of Honolulu for the offense of gross cheat in language following : “That E. A. Taok, at Honolulu, City and County of Honolulu, Territory of Hawaii, on the 10th day of December, 1933, did unlawfully, knowingly and designedly by false and fraudulent representations and pretenses defraud one Maximo Bantigue of his personal property, to-wit, the sum of five dollars ($5.00), lawful money of the United States of America, by falsely, fraudulently and designedly…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Biddle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1907
  2. Kametani v. OkuhamaHawaii Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Territory of Hawaii v. de NobrigaHawaii Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Watumull v. Tax CommissionerHawaii Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Territory of Hawaii v. MeyerHawaii Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Meyer v. Territory of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
  4. Cabrinha v. Hilo Tribune Herald, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Jimmie Lee Flores v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API