Legal Opinion

Furtado v. Rezents

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1935No. 2173PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

PETERS, J.

This is an appeal from a decree canceling a deed from the petitioner to his son Manuel Furtado Rezents upon the ground of fraud. The trial court granted ancillary relief immaterial to the issues on this appeal.

No specifications of error are included in appellant’s brief as required by the rule of court. This is a fault of recurring frequency and if persisted in the court for its own protection will be compelled to resort to punitive measures.

Appellant claims that there exists a fatal variance between the allegations of the bill and the petitioner’s proof; that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mid-Pacific Dress Manufacturing Co. v. CadinhaHawaii Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Meheula v. HaustenHawaii Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Cummins v. CumminsHawaii Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Keanu v. KamanouluHawaii Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Christley v. MagoonHawaii Supreme Court · 1901

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Territory v. MartinHawaii Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Watumull v. Tax CommissionerHawaii Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Territory of Hawaii v. MeyerHawaii Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Meyer v. Territory of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
  5. Chun Chew Pang v. Chun Chew KeeHawaii Supreme Court · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API