Legal Opinion

City of Lincoln v. Sun Vapor Street-Light Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 29, 1894No. 328PublishedCited by 66 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Nebraska.

1Opinion of the Court

SANBORN, Circuit Judge.

The city of Lincoln, Neb., the plaintiff in error, insists that the circuit court for the district of Nebraska erred in rendering judgment against it for damages for the breach of a contract between that city and the Sun Vapor Street-Light Company of Canton, Ohio, the defendant in error. The contract .was for lighting the city of Lincoln. The case was tried to a jury, and the judgment is upon the verdict. In this court it was not argued orally, hut was submitted on briefs. When the writ of error was sued out, counsel for the city assigned 21 errors.

The twenty-fourth…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bank of United States v. DandridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  2. Columbia & Puget Sound Railroad v. HawthorneSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Union Pac. Ry. Co. v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1892
  4. Lincoln v. Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  5. Union Water Co. v. Murphy's Flat Fluming Co.California Supreme Court · 1863

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Travelers' Ins. v. MelickCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
  2. City of Manning v. German Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  3. Modern Woodman Accident Ass'n v. ShryockNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Brazell v. Zeigler, County ClerkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  5. Paxson v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API