Legal Opinion

Village of Zumbrota v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 4, 1968No. 40785PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sheran, Justice.

Appeal from an order of the district court denying defendant’s motion to vacate a judgment except upon condition that he file a bond to insure payment of costs, disbursements, and expenses incurred by reason of any judgment ultimately secured by plaintiff.

The village council of the village of Zumbrota ordered defendant, Lloyd H. Johnson, to remove “that certain hazardous building and personal property or fixtures and debris” from premises owned by him in the village upon the ground that the building and debris constituted “a fire hazard or a hazard to public safety or health.”…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. Caltex (Philippines), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. State ex rel. Blaisdell v. BillingsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  3. Dimke v. FinkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  4. Hunter v. Zenith Dredge Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  5. Feikert v. WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Walker v. Johnson CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  2. City of West St. Paul v. KrengelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  3. Ukkonen v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  4. City of Barnum v. SabriCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API