Legal Opinion

United States v. Caltex (Philippines), Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 12, 1953No. 16PublishedCited by 128 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Vinson

Each of the respondent oil companies owned terminal facilities in the Pandacan district of Manila at the time of the Japanese attack upon Pearl Harbor. These were used to receive, handle and store petroleum products from incoming ships and to release them for further distribution throughout the Philippine Islands. Wharves, rail and automotive equipment, pumps, pipe lines, storage tanks, and warehouses were included in the property on hand at the outbreak of the war, as well as a normal supply of petroleum products.

News of the Pearl Harbor attack reached Manila early in the morning of December…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bowles v. WillinghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Lichter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Omnia Commercial Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Mitchell v. HarmonySupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  5. Bowditch v. BostonSupreme Court of the United States · 1880

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by128 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. William Hohri v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
  3. United States v. Central Eureka Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Hearts Bluff Game Ranch, Inc. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Temistocles Ramirez De Arellano v. Caspar W. Weinberger, Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984

123 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API