City of Barnum v. Sabri
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WRIGHT, Judge.
Appellant challenges the denial of his motion for relief from judgment, arguing that the district court erred by ruling that Minn. R. Civ. P. 60.02(e), which allows relief from a judgment if it is no longer equitable for the judgment to have pro spective application, does not apply where a change in circumstances occurs due to voluntary actions by the moving party. Appellant also argues that the district court abused its discretion by denying the motion without (1) considering all of the evidence before concluding that a change in circumstances has not occurred and (2)…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- System Federation No. 91 v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Twelve John Does v. District of Columbia Appeal of Edwin A. Meese, Iii, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Hentschel v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Sommers v. ThomasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Elsen v. State Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Civil Commitment of MoenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- In re Commitment of JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
- Buck Blacktop, Inc. v. Gary Contracting and Trucking Company, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
- In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Edward Everett UrbanekCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2025