Aguilera v. Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HUG, Chief Judge:
The questions before us are whether the appellants’ state law fraud and breach of contract claims against their former employer are preempted by section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (“LMRA”), 29 U.S.C. § 185, and whether them statutory claim was properly dismissed. The district court granted summary judgment to the appellants’ former employer on the appellants’ claims brought under California law, ruling that section 301 preempted them. The court also held that the appellants’ state statutory and public policy claims were barred by the applicable statute of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Livadas v. BradshawSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Tigg v. Pirelli Tire Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2007
- Garley v. Sandia Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Low v. Linkedin Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
- Buschman v. Anesthesia Business Consultants LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Luxul Technology Inc. v. Nectarlux, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.