Ohio Pyro, Inc. v. Ohio Department of Commerce
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.
{¶ 1} This appeal implicates the “collateral attack” doctrine, which disfavors the authority of one court to revisit a judgment of another court, in another proceeding, in other than very limited circumstances. For the reasons that follow, we determine that this case amounts to an impermissible collateral attack on a prior valid judgment. We reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.
Relevant Background
{¶ 2} On June 27,1997, defendant-appellant Safety 4th Fireworks, Inc. (“Safety 4th”)1 faxed an application letter to defendant-appellant, Ohio Department of Commerce, Division of State Fire…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. CalhounOhio Supreme Court · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by171 opinions
- Bank of Am., N.A. v. Kuchta (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
- Moore v. City of MiddletownOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- ProgressOhio.org, Inc. v. JobsOhio (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
- Lingo v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 2014
- Kincaid v. Erie InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2010
166 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.