Legal Opinion

Ohio Pyro, Inc. v. Ohio Department of Commerce

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 2007No. 2006-0785PublishedCited by 171 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.

{¶ 1} This appeal implicates the “collateral attack” doctrine, which disfavors the authority of one court to revisit a judgment of another court, in another proceeding, in other than very limited circumstances. For the reasons that follow, we determine that this case amounts to an impermissible collateral attack on a prior valid judgment. We reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.

Relevant Background

{¶ 2} On June 27,1997, defendant-appellant Safety 4th Fireworks, Inc. (“Safety 4th”)1 faxed an application letter to defendant-appellant, Ohio Department of Commerce, Division of State Fire…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State v. CalhounOhio Supreme Court · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by171 opinions

  1. Bank of Am., N.A. v. Kuchta (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Moore v. City of MiddletownOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  3. ProgressOhio.org, Inc. v. JobsOhio (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Lingo v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Kincaid v. Erie InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2010

166 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API