Legal Opinion

Kincaid v. Erie Insurance

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 2010No. 2009-1936PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.

{¶ 1} Appellant Erie Insurance Company (“Erie”) appeals from the court of appeals’ judgment that appellee, Don B. Kincaid Jr., has standing to file an action for insurance coverage when he did not present a claim for a loss potentially covered by his insurance and did not give notice to the insurer of the alleged loss prior to filing a complaint.

{¶ 2} Because it is undisputed that Erie has not denied or refused to pay a claim for a loss potentially covered by insurance, we hold that there is no justiciable controversy between adverse parties in this case. Appellee lacks standing to pursue his…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Midwest Pride IV, Inc. v. PontiousOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Zoppo v. Homestead InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Fortner v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Ohio Pyro, Inc. v. Ohio Department of CommerceOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Midwest Specialties, Inc. v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. v. SchwartzwaldOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Regis Lutz v. Chesapeake Appalachia, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  3. State Ex Rel. Merrill v. Ohio Department of Natural ResourcesOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Torrance v. RomOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. Albert v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API