Legal Opinion

State v. Calhoun

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 1999No. 98-1627PublishedCited by 1,003 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.

We are called upon to answer three questions. First, must a trial court, when considering a postconviction relief petition, accept the affidavits presented as true? Second, did the trial court err in dismissing defendant’s petition for postconviction relief on the allegation of ineffective assistance of counsel without holding an evidentiary hearing? Third, were the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law adequate to satisfy the requirements of R.C. 2953.21? For the reasons below, we answer the first two questions in the negative, the last question in the affirmative, and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Sumner v. MataSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State v. LytleOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State v. ColeOhio Supreme Court · 1982

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,003 opinions

  1. State v. GondorOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Charles L. Lorraine v. Ralph Coyle, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  3. State v. Apanovitch (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State v. CalhounOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. BushOhio Supreme Court · 2002

998 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API