Legal Opinion

Venier v. Forbes

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 27, 1946No. Nos. 34,252, 34,271PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

This was a suit to rescind, avoid, and set aside a sale by plaintiff to defendant Forbes of his interest in a copartnership originally composed of plaintiff and defendants, and to restore to plaintiff his original rights as such copartner, including an accounting of the entire original partnership venture. The partnership operated under the firm name of U. S. Plating Company. The suit was founded upon plaintiff’s claim of fraud practiced by defendants upon him to accomplish the sale. Defendants, by appropriate pleadings, put these claims in issue. These issues were…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bohn Manufacturing Co. v. HollisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  2. Prince v. SonnesynSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  3. Meiners v. KennedySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  4. Potvin v. PotvinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  5. Wolfson v. Northern States Management Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Harding v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  2. U.S. Bank N. A. v. Cold Spring Granite Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  3. Advanced Communication Design, Inc. v. FollettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  4. Lipinski v. LipinskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  5. Fewell v. TappanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API