Legal Opinion

U.S. Bank N. A. v. Cold Spring Granite Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 7, 2011No. A10-0252PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, G. Barry, Justice.

This case arises out of a reverse stock split in which minority shareholders were forced to accept cash in exchange for their shares. Thomas Moore, Ann McCabe, and U.S. Bank (Moores) are trustees of eight appellant family trusts (Moore Trusts) that brought suit against respondent Cold Spring Granite Company (CSG) and its chairman and CEO respondent Patrick D. Alexander after CSG stock belonging to the trusts was fractionalized in a reverse stock split and redeemed for cash at a price determined by CSG’s board of directors (Board). The district court…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Guth v. Loft, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1939
  3. Donahue v. Rodd Electrotype Co. of New England, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  4. Schnell v. Chris-Craft Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1971
  5. Martens v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Graphic Communications Local 1B Health & Welfare Fund "A" v. CVS Caremark Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  2. Schatz v. Interfaith Care CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  3. Sanchez v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  4. Robert B. Allen v. Devon Energy Holdings, L.L.C. F/K/A Chief Holdings, L.L.C, and Trevor D. Rees-Jones, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2012
  5. Dukowitz v. Hannon Security ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API